Editorial policy

Radiant Design Review aims to make digital design easier to understand without overstating what an example proves. We value clear explanations, useful distinctions and honest limits.

Accuracy and independence

We check factual statements against suitable references and take care to separate established information from opinion or interpretation. We do not claim that a design choice works for everyone or every context. Editorial decisions are made for reader value, not in exchange for payment or access.

Corrections

If you spot an error, send the page details and a clear description through the Contact page. We review correction requests and amend material when warranted, making substantive changes clear to readers where appropriate.

Partnerships and illustrations

Paid, gifted or otherwise partner-supported material is identified clearly on the relevant page. Partner involvement does not buy editorial approval. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; where this applies, we label them so readers can distinguish illustrative imagery from documentation.